the man is charged with trafficking when in fact the kids probably approached him

the idea of payment for sex is not harmful or regarded as such by many people, especially the people receiving payment

this is the imposition of Western standards on Asian governments

Asiangovernments are making sure they get IMF and World Bank loans, so they have to look like they follow the official sex rules

the ngo's play a word game to make things look worse than they are

trafficking originally meant transporting someone against their will for sex slavery

now it is the payment of any money for sex

or maybe it will come to mean any sex period

the poor think very differently but they are never factored in. the NGO's claim to speak for them and protect them but that is always a lie the press never reports.

sex never hurt anyone. These people are insane. Who put them in charge anyway?