OTOH, you can make good arguments against the prohibitions on sex tourism without necessarily linking them to pedophilia.

Sex tourism laws, first of all, infringe on the tourists' freedom of movement and freedom to travel. Countries are no better than North Korea if they don't allow free travel.

Further, since sex tourism laws ostensibly apply only to some people, they are discriminatory. The travel bans are not against everyone [as is, for example, the travel ban on Americans travelling to Cuba - it applies to everyone] but only against those suspected of or caught as being sexual tourists.

And finally, the thing which is, to me, the most important, but which the globalists and UN-worshippers think is a positive (!), sex tourism laws are extraterritorial, and impose the laws of a country, usually First World, over the whole world and in particular over other countries, usually Third World, which do not have the possibility to impose laws back onto the First World country. They are therefore directly denying the sovereignty of the Third World country, which makes them a threat to sovereignty everywhere, and inherently imperialist and neo-colonial. Where are the Mau Mau when you need them?