Thanks for your notice on this item. I have to skip so many of your posts due to length, quantity, and your careful attention to detail. I can rarely dedicate that much time to GC (but I'm working on improving that situation).

You could have written pages on this 'analysis' I'm sure. I appreciate the brief report with the humorous jabs you threw in.

The analysis was a quick read and seemed almost "childish" (haha), not what I would expect from a master's thesis. But I am really enjoying Tom's review.

It may have been posted earlier but I too missed it.

Thanks Dante for your long and your short posts and your dedication to GC, just in case that is not communicated often enough.