Little girls flock to me because I like them so much, because I clearly want to be around them, because I will actually listen to her ideas and concerns when other adults won't, because I will give her my undivided attention when other adults cast her aside.

I do understand this phenomenon, I really do. There are a lot of girls who would benefit greatly from that level of attention.

... if you think that being in love with my Little Girl makes me less able to cater to her every will,

I imagine you're right that you can cater to her every whim(?) better. The question is whether that is what's good for her or not. Judging by stories people tell online, pedophiles have a hard time setting limits for kids they like, and sometimes that's what kids need. Coming to expect that a good relationship is one where the other person caters to your every whim is not good.

Listening with endless patience and genuine interest is good and involves no conflict with your own desires. But if the question were whether it was a good idea for her to keep visiting with you, that might be one where other people would have a better perspective. I'm not saying they would say you shouldn't, but they might see the situation more clearly. Because that's a case where your desire (to keep seeing her) could be in conflict with her interest.

Then we come to sexual activity. For a lot of pedophiles in your position (not you, I understand), their own desires might come to the fore there, where elsewhere they were listening intently and meeting her every whim. In the world of adults, it matters a whole lot to the participants whether an intimate friendship ends up including sex or not. You'd suspect the same thing would work for pedophiles having friendships with children they are attracted to.

My contention is that at the moment that such a sex vs no sex decision was being made, outsiders who magically knew the entire history and situation would see more clearly whether that was a good idea for the girl than the man would.

I think the same applies to when society as a whole is thinking about what legal restrictions there should be on situations like that in general.

My point wasn't that pedophiles' opinions should be ignored, it was that they didn't have some insight that other people don't have -- that's the only thing that could explain the 75% vs 1% difference in a light that defended the pedophiles' position.

If 75% of physicists believe some strange fact about time and space and relativity that only 1% of the general population believes, then the physicists are quite likely right because of their specialized knowledge.