"It's not a central stance or even a VirPed stance, but my personal stance. I never said we shouldn't discuss such things among ourselves with humility, and "necessarily" is too strong."

So you now do allow discussion at VirPed of whether adult/child sex could be or has been OK outside of the present laws? Or whether those laws are wrong?

Or have you simply abandoned ANY reasons to justify this stance?

When last I checked accepting the prohibition of this otherwise legal topic was a prerequisite for joining VirPed. And FAQ 7 hasn't been rewritten. Is this an omission?

Dante