You'd have to do a lot better than just citing a peer-reviewed article as its own evidence of fraud.

I also count 7 co-authors on the paper you cite, hardly suggesting he is some lone crazy voice.

Science is greater than Cantor. If you're on the "rip him apart" side, I honestly suggest sticking with, supporting, and defending science.

You like science. Then show me the peer-reviewed article attacking his findings on the grounds you raise. That would be the first step within the framework of science to resolving this disagreement.