GirlChat #602137

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Sure thing!

Posted by Baldur on Friday, September 12 2014 at 10:04:27PM
In reply to Re: Sure thing! posted by EthanEdwards on Friday, September 12 2014 at 9:15:40PM

"You'd have to do a lot better than just citing a peer-reviewed article as its own evidence of fraud."

jd provided the article and a link to information about how sampling is supposed to be done. What better way to refute a poorly designed study than to cite it?

2 + 2 = ?

Perhaps you need to be spoon fed the answer before you are willing to acknowledge it. Around here we tend to look at the evidence and come to our own conclusions. You might even say that's why we're here. I personally found the anti-pedophile studies far more convincing than the pro-pedophile arguments in determining that the antis had no idea what they were talking about.







Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?