GirlChat #602137
"You'd have to do a lot better than just citing a peer-reviewed article as its own evidence of fraud."
jd provided the article and a link to information about how sampling is supposed to be done. What better way to refute a poorly designed study than to cite it? 2 + 2 = ? Perhaps you need to be spoon fed the answer before you are willing to acknowledge it. Around here we tend to look at the evidence and come to our own conclusions. You might even say that's why we're here. I personally found the anti-pedophile studies far more convincing than the pro-pedophile arguments in determining that the antis had no idea what they were talking about. |