I am really sorry, jeep, but if you actually read my thesis instead of what I post here, you will see that I took your comments to heart and SPECIFICALLY state in my discussion and limitations that this study follows the discourse, which has as an underlying discourse that child abuse is wrong. That therefore the language will be biased towards that. I understand (or.I probably don't) understand your frustration, but please don't make these claims without actually reading what I wrote.

In my results, I included the answers that said child 'abuse' is not harmful. I have not done a content analysis of this website, other studies have done that. I discuss that specifically in my discussion - which you obviously have not read. I included those opinions, but they were not the majority voices (maybe more people with your opinion should have filled it in for that) so that was not my main conclusion. But I discussed them definitely.


And yes, sorry I am not a native speaker, that was a stupid mistake, thank you for pointing that out.