GirlChat #602908

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: That's Jalisco...

Posted by qtns2di4 on Thursday, September 25 2014 at 6:48:18PM
In reply to That's Jalisco... posted by jd420 on Thursday, September 25 2014 at 0:27:09PM


Oh, and incidentally, it's "naked people," not CP, so one can assume that it's probably fairly normative. Still ended up with human trafficking charges, though, so you can assume that those are usually fraud.

It is confuzing, because while Mexican criminal law is for the most part a state power, state border crossings turn cases into federal, as in the US, and a different federal criminal code applies.

The federal criminal code, and at least some of the states, among which I am guessing Jalisco is included, includes KP (and all pedo-crimes) as a subset of trafficking. Which of course is bullshit. Even the most narrowly defined KP does not imply trafficking, especially not at the consumer end; and KP is defined rather widely in Mexico (cartoons are KP, for instance.)

Of course, as you point out, this is done so that all pedo-crimes defendants can be said to be accuzed of trafficking.

Trafficking itself, real trafficking, is, barring some of the cartels, non-existent.

The silver lining is that questioning the reality of trafficking you may end up questioning the legitimacy of all pedo crimes under the same heading. But hey, this is how antis wrote their laws...






qtns2di4





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?