But still I will, because I like you!

:p :)

Can you guys describe what you specifically prefer in a little girl (or boy if you are a homosexual or bisexual paedosexual).

What draws you to them? What about their looks, personality, mannerisms, and age? What ages do you like specifically?

I tend to drift back and forth between body parts. A perennial favorite are her hands. But I have at times focused more on tummies, butts, feet, navels, napes, ears. I particularly appreciate puffies, partly because of their extremely ephemeral nature. These days I am on a roll about legs; probably because I am now close to several girls whose legs are just too awesome. The main universals of little girls which I feel very attracted to, have already been mentioned: general body structure; large heads; and I would add the hyperbolic curve girls' bones make in the small of her backs (Technically speaking, the Michelis' Rhombus.) The proportions of little girls are simply the best human proportions to me.

If I had to choose a second, I would choose boys. But my sample of boys is small. My attraction to boys is considerably rarer. I again like their body structure in particular, above that of adults. But I couldn't point out body parts like I could with girls.

If I could "design" a girl, she would be short for her age, have short hair, wavy, a round face with soft plumpy cheeks, a nose on the small side, her ears would have a large angle with her head and be very curvy, her eyes slightly slanted, not necessarily as much as Asian, but certainly not round, her smile would be big, and her teeth would have to be imperfect: bucky or one or two out of place does it. She would have to be on the skinny side, so her back would show her Michelis' Rhombus, her tummy would be flat and her belly button more evident; her collarbones would be in display at their near ends right in the front, so would her scapulae, and her arms, legs and fingers would look longer and her elbow and knee joints would be more bony both to touch and look. Her fingernails and toenails would be trimmed short giving the tip of her fingers a roundish look. She would be more or less dark skinned; rather brown than black, but rather brown than white too; a general complexion prevalent in Latinas with more Amerindian than White or Black roots, Amerindians themselves, and Southeast Asians, as well as present in Southern Europeans, and common in Middle Easterners and South Asians.

All that said, there have been exceptions to all of that. I have liked girls who were tall for her ages, with long hair, with different facial features, with perfect teeth; with muscular and with overweight bodies; and both much whiter and much darker than that.

As I told you about boys, my sample is too small to distinguish patterns clearly. Of all the patterns I can spot with girls, I spot none of the body parts patterns clearly. The racial pattern seems to hold true. The body type pattern does not: I prefer muscular to skinny boys, and so far I have never liked an overweight boy.

In terms of personality, every girl is a different challenge. If I had to choose, I think I would like best of all the self-confidence and defiance, yet also drive to succeed, from The Cousin. It is a very problematic personality in a world that doesn't give minors their due respect, but I think her personality also makes her, out of all my girls, the one who is more long term well rounded to be stable in her personal life, and professionally successful, with or without me. But the huge heart of Rroma girl is attractive in itself. So is the more introvert but no less thoughtful and very responsibility driven outlook on life from My Twin. And some girls just wanna have fun too, like Baby Gaga, and that is also fun to hang around with. Trying to generalize, I prefer extroverted to introverted girls; nonconformist and curios to girls who don't raise any conflict; and at least sexually curios, even if they cannot be outright sexually assertive in a culture like they and I live in. But… to that too there have been exceptions. Important ones.

I personally wouldn't have a problem with a boy who was like that; but boys who are like that are probably going to think themselves too good to need a loving adult in their lives. So that biases me to more gentle and calm boys, although I still appreciate healthy doses of any of the above qualities together with more calm and gentle personalities.

I will however state outright that my attraction to girls is very much integral and holistic: I desire their bodies and I desire their minds and hearts too. With boys it is more shallow: I would prefer to know, befriend, and mutually meet with their hearts and minds too; but if that were absent and there was just the sexual attraction, then if the boy was OK with an exclusively sexual liaison without a deeper friendship, I would be comfortable with that arrangement (assuming of course that part was legal. It is certainly not.) I do not think I would be able to do that with a girl. In a way, I can view boys as one-night stands; I can only view girls as girlfriends.

As for girls' ages, the simple answer is "from somewhere around 15-18 months to when they look like women, rather than children or transitional" It is more complex though. Following the curve description, I would say my AOA is shaped like a M. It starts at that age, 15-18 months, rises steadily and peaks at something like 4 years, give or take 1 year. Then it declines slightly, though still remains high all through kindergarten and elementary, and rises again to a new peak during the tween years, roughly 11-13, then declines much faster and tapers off. By 16 it becomes outright rare I have any physical attraction. However, I usually do not stop being attracted to girls I was once attracted in that age range and development stages. Celebs are the easiest examples: I was attracted to Christina Ricci and Anna Paquin as children, and I remain attracted to them, even now they're both above 30 and very much women. My AOA is a description of who I can start liking, but not of who I can continue liking if I started before. In that sense I am not so exclusive.

With boys it is simpler. It is rare at all ages. But it starts around 5, steadily increases to peak at tween range, 11-13, like it does with girls, then goes off quickly after, like with girls too. I again lack a sample to evaluate the grandfather hypothesis properly, but it may work. I know I still wouldn't kick Thomas Sangster out even today.