"I religiously avoid doing or saying anything that could damage my girls."

"I know you do. But it's good for all of us to know that good intentions aren't always enough in human relations in general. If someone suggested to me a way I could have been a better parent to my girls or a better husband to my wife, I was happy to listen and consider what they had to say -- not always happy, but willing."

LOL.

From the moment you've gotten here the regular theme of your posting is your inability to take well intentioned advice as well as your outright hostility towards those who give it.

Clearly your intentions fail you time and again in your relations with your own community. Hence all the good advice you've ignored.

"I write bits of fiction sometimes. Would people be interested in a fictional GM (non-erotic, of course)?"

GC isn't a site for fiction. And your "RL" talk about girls smacks enough of the fictional to satisfy my curiosity about what you imagine girls to be like. The fictional girl who is written by a keen enough observer of RL girls has the power to surprise that RL girls do. None of the girls you have ever described fail to sound like the projections of your longings. This is bad enough coming from a pedo, but even worse coming from an anti.

"Telling kids nasty lies about their parents, leaving them unsupervised with alcohol so they can get sloshed, driving them around when you are really drunk (OK, that's illegal but not the kind of illegal people mean at GC that prohibits saying things, right?) "

Wrong.

Drunken driving is illegal. And anyone posting about it may face editing for a Rule 6 violation.

Time and again the mods have to keep reminding folks that there are reasons why the FAQ doesn't specify which laws. The antis will use any laws as a pretext to try to shut us down if we let them.

"One way of looking at this situation that you think my criteria for worrisome consequences are stricter than the ones some people here use -- but they are nowhere near the paranoia of modern societal standards."

You have proven time and again to be rather ignorant about how social groups which aren't yours behave and believe. Additionally, you continually believe them to be far more dumb and stupid than they actually are. This is great if you're scaremongering like usual. But its not useful for others who know their communities better.

But this is part of your "wedge" strategy when it comes to "iatrogenic harm." Propose neighbors who are far worse than in real life. And then argue against even the most innocent contact by a ped; as ANY contact between an LG and a pedo could warrant a swoop in and grab from CPS.

By these standards, even a fatherly peck on the cheek is too much.

"Better safe than sorry, right?"

Your version of "safe" has been demonstrated in Rumania, to kill children.

Dante