GirlChat #604301

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Kids these days, they are out of control.

Posted by JackSummer on Friday, October 24 2014 at 03:29:21AM

I am sure many of you have heard this. That kids these days are out of control. Then people offer up a whole list of ways we need to do to punish, demean, and be nasty to them. It's frustrating and something that's a topic of its own but not the point of my post.

I have various sites I like to visit. Recently I read one site talking about Obama and how his recent kiss of a female would not have passed legally in California's new consent laws. Now I am not here to debate either the laws themselves or if Obama passed them. I then began wondering about power dynamics.

Obama is the most powerful man in America, one of the most power in the world. In the minds of most people at least. How can anyone, even his wife consent to sexual contact with him? If we go by standards society claims to have for sexual interactions. Power imbalance is the factor brought of consistently when talking about children and allowing them to consent. If you get someone to admit that children like sexual contact and can consent to it, they will almost always say their consent doesn't matter because of the power imbalance.

Now I guess I do hold to this point of view somewhat. I do believe there is an artificially created power imbalance that strengthens the naturally occurring ones when it comes to adults and children. This is why I say age of consent laws should exist and if someone is under that age they can consent as long as their parents/guardians give consent as well. Otherwise it should still be illegal, though not nearly as harshly punished.

However I do see the hypocrisies in such a point of view and the out right lies that go along with it.

Let's take what I said at first. That people are consistently saying kids are out of control, they have been saying this consistently for centuries. Particularly in adult dominated societies. How can kids be rebellious, out of control, wild, in need of punishment, in need of control, but then completely weak, helpless, obedient, quiet, and scared when they are consensually sexual with an adult? See when you say children can consent, suddenly people say that consent doesn't count because the power imbalance causes them to consent out of fear. Well then how come this imbalance doesn't cause them to obey their parents and teachers with no problem?

The problem is in our society that children are forcefully sexually ignorant and still more often than not raised to obey adults. So the physical and mental imbalance is made worse and more easily manipulated by unscrupulous adults who would seek to rape or molest a child. Then most of society will say that you guys can't consent along with a child because of how they insist on raising their kids.

Then the worst is someone like me, who will raise a child independent and not easily cowed by adult authority. I am legally barred from allowing her to consent with whom she wishes and I will be jailed and her taken from me for knowingly allowing a consensual sexual relationship.

So the contradiction is that kids are out of control, but easily controlled when it is convenient to say so. Kids are easily controlled because of how we raise them, so we must ban them from a pleasurable activity because we don't like it.

On to the next part, about Obama. If we are to take the power imbalance argument to its logical conclusion, politicians would only be able to fuck politicians. Why? Because someone like Obama holds immense power compared to the average person. Even his wife. He holds the power, not her. How can she consent to sexual relations? How about a very rich husband? Does he not hold immense power over his wife? How about me? Physically stronger than every girl I was with. Not only that but since I carry firearms I am more power ten fold than the girls I was with. Most of them knew I was armed. How can they consent when I have such power?

The argument is that children will consent out of fear of that power (let's ignore that they do this for nothing else). However if I use this argument with another non they will say that the girl I slept with was not threatened by me, she trusted me not to wield my power, and was confident I wouldn't. Children are even more idealistic and trusting. Most would never even imagine an adult they look would force them into something sexual. Unless the adult explicitly threatens to use their power. So how can people say the power imbalance argument is legitimate?

It simply isn't.




Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?