"Explain to me how that isn't sexual repression."

Keep in mind that Ethan will likely reply with his "benevolent masters" argument that allows the parent to choose to permit masturbation.

Nevermind that there are no laws which punish the parent who prevents masturbation. The child has no right whatsoever to disagree with their owner. They can just pray for a benevolent master. And meanwhile the self-styled benevolent master argues that his own benevolence is a good enough argument that slavery ought to be tolerated.

If someone could demonstrate any present laws that punish the parents for prohibiting masturbation I would love to stand corrected.

But we all know that any loving relationship the child has exists at the sufferance of their masters; even self-love.

Dante