GirlChat #607186

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

So GTFO.

Posted by jd420 on Thursday, December 11 2014 at 08:05:22AM
In reply to Nature of Pedophilia/GM at the end posted by Missouri on Wednesday, December 10 2014 at 08:28:09AM

I'm thinking there are at least three distinct groups of pedophiles. Those who feel threatened by women, those who have a misguided parental affection, and those who are mentally retarded and identify more with children than adults.

That's... as far as your horizons go, is it?

Kinda says something. Meanwhile...

Those who feel threatened by women...

Yes, I'm sure every female pedophile spends all day trying to run away from themselves, passes out from exhaustion, and does it again immediately upon waking up.

Srsly?

those who have a misguided parental affection

Here we see where your motivations lie. Unfortunately, you put the conclusions you want to reach far, far before reality - hence the content of your post.

Non-pedophiles are "misguided." Pedophiles are perfectly fine, and the standard everyone should be measured against.

See how having an inverse argument-by-assertion - which is just as good as yours - changes everything? Now you have to explain what defect makes people who aren't pedophiles, not-pedophiles.

You can tell a lot about a person by where they bother to exert energy. You... just spent a lot of energy trying to figure out why normal people - pedophiles - 'became' normal. You should have spent that energy trying to figure out where defective people - nonpedophiles - went wrong.

The amount of energy you spent basically establishes two things. One of them is that you're at odds with reality, or else you wouldn't have to go to hell and back to make a square peg fit in a round hole... but the other thing it establishes is that you want to reach an answer of hatred of pedos; energy is expended to reach goals.

Unfortunately for you, in psychology, sociology, the space-time continuum, and the like - everything except metalworking - the more energy you have to spend to hammer something into the shape you insist on having, the less constructive it is... in psychology, it's "escalation of denial," and is rather directly akin to looking at a map of a city you're not in rather than the road and backing up the car to ram it into the wall harder because the map - not the world around you - has to be right.

It also has about the same effect.

Sadly, you've tipped your goals (so gtfo). You've also established an abject failure by the energy:success ratio; things don't really take effort to be themselves.

Come back when you have different, less hurtful and destructive goals.


jd420





Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?