I don't know if you know, but I am not a paedosexual. However I would have no problem providing a vibrator for my (future) preteen daughter (or son? male sex toys are rarer and limited). I would do this because I am aware of how good it can feel to her. I know the benefits of healthy sexual release with orgasm. Not to mention she should learn to pleasure herself and about all of her body. Too many girls grow up with a focus on pleasuring men because believe it or not female sexuality and pleasure is still somewhat taboo for adult females and especially "minor" females.

Also, I would gain some form of pleasure from my daughter being happy and feeling good. No, it isn't sexual pleasure but happiness and pleasure none the less.

The Nintendo comparison is legitimate and actually relevant. I was just reading a thread on Gamefaqs on the Wii U boards about kids not growing up with Nintendo anymore. Multiple posters claimed they would only let their kids play Nintendo to ensure they grew up with Nintendo like they did. This is plainly because of their nostalgia and for themselves. They aren't really interested in what their kid's interests are. It is for themselves.

I, of course, will admit that a non-exclusive paedosexual may provide a sexual toy to their child because the idea of them using it brings them sexual pleasure. That in and of itself is no problem to me. I would take issue with if they took the route of the Nintendo fanboys. Requiring the child use them and not giving them a choice and then making the child use it in front of a camera to share or in front of the parent so the parent could pleasure themselves or others. All of this against what the child feels or wants or is interested in.