GirlChat #608798

Start A New Topic!  Submit SRF  Thread Index  Date Index  

Re: Introducing 'Virtuous Pedophiles'

Posted by EthanEdwards on Friday, January 16 2015 at 02:09:34AM
In reply to Re: Introducing 'Virtuous Pedophiles' posted by Dante on Thursday, January 15 2015 at 11:26:27PM

Scientifically literate Nons such as those at Sexnet have seen through and exposed their sophistry

I am not recalling this. People on Sexnet criticizing VP -- except for the ones who are primarily associated with B4U-ACT or Heretic TOC? Can you refresh my memory?

They refuse to allow any discussions of a world without the laws they endorse

There are reasons for it. It is in practice a source of contentious debates -- while B4U-ACT does not require a specific belief on the matter, they do ban discussing it for just that reason.

Hundreds of VP members would not have joined without our shared ground rule of accepting that adult-child sex is wrong. They give evidence of a large population of girl-attracted pedophiles who wouldn't be caught dead on a site like GC where the pro-contact view is espoused.

One way to look at it is that at GC and BoyChat and elsewhere these issues can be discussed. VP was created to fill another niche. It's not in general a place for deep intellectual discussions. People can belong both places, as Markaba and I do.

They believe that warranted agnosticism is tantamount to endorsement of whatever they're against.

We recognize the scientific open question in our FAQ, "We understand that not all scientists agree on what proportions of different ages of children in different circumstances are harmed and to what extent. This is a complicated matter, and it is one that will ultimately be resolved based on facts, not opinions. We are not scientists."

Our motive for forming VP (instead of staying primarily with B4U-ACT) must primarily be understood in a political context. Humans have to decide what's right and wrong where science does not have answers. VP's charter is that adult-child sexual activity is wrong. This comforts us, and it comforts the broader public to see a large group of pedophiles defining themselves in this way.

The idea that adult-child sexual activity might be legal and accepted some day is seductive to pedophiles. For those who seek some peace in the world as it really exists, avoiding such discussions may be a good choice. If you agree, you might try out VP.






Follow ups:

Post a response :

Nickname Password
E-mail (optional)
Subject







Link URL (optional)
Link Title (optional)

Add your sigpic?