Second opinion... any more?

Ok, a few people have made comments about how some posters like to post GMs that consist of sexual/lustful content (such as Furby's beloved panty-hunting stories or even a regular GM where the poster may comment that a certain sight or action made him aroused, etc).

I feel no need to specifically mention those in my GMs, but occasionally I will throw in such a comment for those of you who like them.

So, here we have a thread for discussing this. Some GLers say that there's nothing wrong with threads about "perving" and "eye candy." Others have said that such GMs disgust them.

To each his/her own...

So, let's discuss it.

I'm workin on it :)

Personally, I see nothing wrong with stories like that. Sexuality can either be a seperate thing from love or it can be an aspect of love.

I agree.

I think that most GLers see it as an aspect of their love for LGs. I love everything about little girls from the beautiful hair on top of their heads right down to their cute little (hot) toes.

You're 2 for 2 :)

Yes, when I'm with Maggie I am FAR more concerned about just being with her, but sexual attraction IS part of my (our) existance.

I am the same way with my YGF.

I think that those who protest such GMs are of the mindset that lusting after an LG excludes the possibility of loving her. I'm here to tell ya fellas, that's total and complete bullshit. I love my little Maggie, but I'm not going to sit here and say that her cute legs & ass don't turn me on. I'm not going to sit here and say that I don't look when her panties come into view.

3 for 3 so far... My LGF (We'll call her "L") likes to flash me every time she gets a chance (and that's almost every night I'm there when she puts on her nightie for bed ;) ).

I'm also not going to sit here and tell a lie by saying I've never fantisized about her in that way....of course I have!

Most of the guys I know with same-age GFs fantasize about their GF when they can't be together.

Does all of this mean that I don't really love her?

Hell no, not even close.

If you think it does, then I think you're insane - truly.

I lost count... What is it now, 5 for 5? Or was it 6? (grin)

I love her more than life itself, but that doesn't mean I have to be blind to the fact that her body is fuckin' beautiful!!!

Forever and ever, amen.

And what about those so-called "Furby moments?" If I see an LG in a skirt, should I try my best to avoid seeing her panties? What're you, nuts?! Any MAN is going to try to get a peek at a WOMAN's panties if he can, why the hell should you think we're different in that aspect? We're not.

Not much of a discussion in this reply of mine, since I seem to be agreeing with you on everything and backing you up ;)

"Girl watching" is a great past-time of men everywhere.

Even the ones that claim they are not MAAs will at least glance, and many take amusement in their antics :)

It doesn't mean we don't care about LGs and it doesn't mean that we view them as strictly sex objects. It means, very simply, that we're just looking at what we enjoy looking at. That's all! It's nothing more complex than that. We're not looking up an LG's dress thinking "Damn, I sure don't have any respect for this bitch and I sure am glad she's nothing but a sex object." How can ANYONE think that?!

I have no idea.

I think this is a big problem. A few people have gotten so high-and-mighty on the "innocent little girls" aspect of their attraction that they've completely forgotten that there IS a sexual aspect to our attraction and repressing/denying it is foolhardy.

Agreed. Again.

In short, there's not a damn thing wrong with expressing our sexual interests, especially when you consider that those interest have a very small chance of ever becoming real.

Small chance, yeah, but they do happen. Sometimes unbeknownst to parents, sometimes with their blessing. Too bad the law can't be as understanding as said parents!

So, guys, lighten up for fuck's sake! Look at some panties, pop wood, grin from ear-to-ear, and move on with life. It's not a national crisis, it's just "checking out the babes!"

I'm not crazy about the word "babes" whether it applies to LGs, YGs, TGs, or even "adults," but I'm not about to start a "war" over it, because that's been done before, and I really don't care. I'm not fond of it, but I'm not about to preach hell-and-brimstone about it :)

I think that's about the only part of this post that I *didn't* agree with 100%. I would personally like to hear responses from anyone on the other side of this proverbial fence.

Much Peace & Love, and Many GMs to You All,