GirlChat #230765
Re: ...
Posted by inygmuh on 2003-September-20 06:16:50 EDT, Saturday
In reply to ... posted by Leon on 2003-September-20 06:01:23 EDT, Saturday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
I'm the same way. I think I missed this point in my reply to BB's original message...
No look at it this way. How many GM's have you read that are [nothing] but lust?
Too many.
How many have some real love in them?
I hope the one I just posted conveys that, to an extent. Mine is something of a hybrid story including mostly appreciation and love, though hinting at just a little bit of lust. I try to walk the line when I can ;)
You will NEVER prove to the antis that you truely love LG's when all they see is us posting shit about how i saw this LG and saw her panties and how i got a major wood. FFS learn some self control.
Another good point.
The way i've seen a lot of GM posts (barring Aqua, Newt, and Dirt maybe some others i forget)
I hope I fall in with newt's group...
...are they see the girls as just objects.
That's the impression I get from many of them, though even some of those kind are in somewhat-good taste.
And even liking adult women as well that pisses me off to no end.
Are you referring to the ones that are MAAs and attracted to "adults?" If not, I'm confused. If so, I don't really see a problem with that. My primary AoA is about 7-15, but I occasionally come across a few outside that range that I have feelings for. What's the harm? It's more about the kind of the person than the age group they fall into. I've seen some really intelligent 12 year olds, and I've likewise seen way too many "ditzy" or just plain stupid ones in their 20s, 30s, and even older. Age is nothing but a number. It's the MENTAL age that really makes the relationship work, although the stage of physical development and appearance *does* play a part of varying degrees, depending on the person.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.