GirlChat #230923
This is the type problem I spoke of
Posted by HPNY on 2003-September-21 16:34:51 EDT, Sunday
In reply to NO posted by Amator Puellularum on 2003-September-21 15:35:54 EDT, Sunday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
I have very carefully re-read Furby's post now three times to be sure that I have not missed a subtext or statement. NO WHERE in the post to which you replied does furbs state or insinuate that any of the rest of us identify girls by the color of their panties. He simply stated that he does.
In a recent post, Furbydad devoted an entire paragraph to a girl, a handicapped girl whom he expressed concern about, who he identified as having red hair and freckles. NEVER ONCE did he mention the color of her panties. In fact, in the entire post, he never mentions the color of any girl's panties, only mentions viewing panties once, but mentions talking to girls twice and once mentions the difficulty of getting to know girls, including one with whom he appears to have a non-panty-viewing based relationship. How many little girls do you have that type of relationship with?
In another recent post, Furbydad discussed his viewing of panties among little girls at McDonalds, and his concern that he never upset them or their parents by being obvious. He again discussed talking to girls, getting to know them, and even insinuates that talking and romance would be preferable to panty watching if it were an option. That sounds to me like a very realistic observation, and a very honest one.
It appears, then, that you seem to not pay heed to the parts of posts where furby discusses things other than the colour of their panties, and that you read things that aren't there by saying he accuses others of identifying girls that way. He apparently notices MUCH more than panties, and by his very PRESENCE at the events he discusses may actually play an active role in contributing to their well being. But you wouldn't know these things because you have chosen to single out Furbydad for his admission to viewing panties and getting a sexual charge out of them.
If seeing panties or getting a sexual thrill over seeing any part or parcel of little girls is wrong, then many more of us than Furbydad are wrong. I work daily with little girls, and I see panties, I see down shirts, I even have been known to think about those things while I masturbate - but it is not why I was with them, and it does NOT change the fact that I care for their non-sexual side and their individuality and well being DEEPLY. If you have never viewed a little girls panties or masturbated over the thoughts of what they may include, then I suppose you are superior to us and have a right to be critical - but by the same token I would also have to suppose that you cannot relate to most girl lovers out there because your situation is not the most common one.
I grow tired of hateful posts, and your "NO" post was simply hateful. There was no other reason for it's existence. It did bring factual information to the board in sharing with us how you identify girls, but it supported NO ONE but yourself and attacked someone without due provocation. I do not have children, but I have had plenty of children within my care, both family and otherwise, and I do believe that if I were to have children, I would sooner entrust their care to Furbydad than yourself, as Furbydad has presented ample evidence that he does respect girls and wishes not to harm them. You, on the other hand, have presented evidence that you might share with them the finer points of becoming hateful.
Do we really need personal vendettas on this board? Are you so insecure that you think we won't judge you on your own merits without attacking others? Just because you have been open with the world about who you are does not make you an expert on everyone's morality. I think Furbydad is a little odd at times, sure - but certainly not worthy of the ire you direct at him. He seems to exercise a great deal of discretion in his activities, where as you don't seem concerned at drawing attention to all of us through your own activities. Indeed a case could be made that Furbydad is more discreet than yourself. The pity is not that Furbydad looks at panties - it is that you feel obligated to judge him and everyone like him because they are not like you.
HPNY
Proud Panty Watching Pedo, Girl Lover, Award Winning Teacher, Defender of the Innocent, All around nice guy, and Disgusted Patron.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Hold On Now - 28 on 2003-September-22 19:56:08 EDT, Monday - (0 / 0 / 0)