GirlChat #270678
Re: 2 for 1 deal
Posted by Celebrator on 2004-July-27 14:44:01 EDT, Tuesday
In reply to 2 for 1 deal posted by child beauty on 2004-July-26 21:45:56 EDT, Monday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
Isn't the USA very puritanical ?
And eh, you could *just see* her panties ? Doesn't lifting her shirt all over her head make that you can *clearly see* her panties since that would be the *only thing* she would be wearing then ?
There is very much damn lucky people on here who are near lil girls so very much.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- philosophical debate - Carrollingian on 2004-July-29 00:53:06 EDT, Thursday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- nope - child beauty on 2004-July-28 13:12:16 EDT, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- yes - child beauty on 2004-July-27 15:00:15 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 8)
- Re: yes - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 15:58:53 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)
- nope - child beauty on 2004-July-27 19:28:22 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Re: nope - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 19:40:36 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- hmm - child beauty on 2004-July-27 20:12:31 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: hmm - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 20:22:38 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- please - child beauty on 2004-July-27 20:30:10 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: please - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 21:12:21 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- its cool man-nt - child beauty on 2004-July-27 21:41:30 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: please - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 21:12:21 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- please - child beauty on 2004-July-27 20:30:10 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: hmm - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 20:22:38 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- hmm - child beauty on 2004-July-27 20:12:31 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- Re: nope - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 19:40:36 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 5)
- nope - child beauty on 2004-July-27 19:28:22 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 6)
- Re: yes - Celebrator on 2004-July-27 15:58:53 EDT, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 7)