i'll tell you, all these questions have been difficult & a constant source of worry in my life, regardless of any public profile of pedoness or content of posts.
i can totally relate to madpenguin & others being hesitant to join sites w/ 'prurient' & 'salacious' material. i agree w/ mp on a lot of stuff.
but i think one of the values of online support is that it helps people. it's just like the 'self help' described by Dr Frans Gieles ⚠️ ↗. to fit that role, maybe talk needs to reflect the real lives of maa's, including the dingier contents of their fevered brows. if the profile is too tailored, a lot of maa's will stay away becos they won't recognize themselves in what is being said.
alla same, i don't want to be associated w/ anthing illegal, & personally i prefer to avoid sexually oriented material. its just my way of playing that stuff down, not a moral choice. more for my peace of mind...
GirlChat #347543
Re: Second Thoughts
Posted by kea on 2006-March-28 16:15:18 EST, Tuesday
In reply to Second Thoughts posted by Dante on 2006-March-28 13:15:42 EST, Tuesday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- GMs as a 'feature' of GC - madpenguin on 2006-March-29 01:17:04 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: GMs as a 'feature' of GC - kea on 2006-March-29 15:15:01 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 0)