I sometimes hate posting here.

And yet, you know where the door is. on to the substance, however.

That was so completely uncalled for.

Well, let's take a closer look at that statement, shall we? Yes. The observation you note as "uncalled for" was... what?

I'd say that keeping children alive is better than mourning their death. Apparently, you feel the opposite.

Yes.

Now, let's look at the context this was in, shall we?

When Arch proposed the opinion that the cost in human life was regrettable at best, your immediate choice was to launch into an ad hominem attack in which you essentially called him a heartless bastard.

The opposite of x is "not x," so the "uncalled for" statement is the only true statement that could be derived, and if you think that the implications of the only avaliable deduction are "uncalled for," perhaps you might want to look at the pot calling the kettle black.

One thing remains, that it is better to preserve life than to mourn it. I'm sorry you disagree.