i re-read the rules. perhaps i'm simply being obtuse, but i don't see how any were violated. not only did i not ever admit to any specific crime, should one have even occured, but i did not even directly say anything at all about children, least of all in the edited portion of the text.
the only rules that are even slightly pertinent are rules 5 and 6.
rule 5 says "it's necessary to talk about sex, and sometimes to share sexual experiences. we expect these to be tastefully worded and not mistaken for erotica. do not go into detail, especially if the act described is/was unlawful".
i adhered perfectly to that. details were minimal, language was restricted in a tasteful and non-licentious manner. and whatever was said was contextually relevant to the question i was asking.
as a note, rule 6, which asks for no admissions to potentially illegal activities, i would assume would refer to very specific illegal activities, since rule 5 implies quite openly that we're at liberty to discuss potentially illegal activities in a vague and benign manner.

all i was looking for was some measure to make distinction between what is commonly viewed as "exploitation" and what actually IS exploitation, and perhaps how out motivations affect that label. and i thought that this community would have better insight into such topics than the rest of society at large.

either way, it was certainly not my intention to confuse, nor to break any posting rules. to the assessment of broken rules, i fail to see the justification, but promise none the less to screen my posts even more rigorously in the future. as for confusion, i tried my best to be clear, and hope this offers the necessary clarification of intent.