All of the above as well :)

Unlike Enigma, I do not see such men as inherently dangerous. There are many MANY men who have nothing but sexual lust for women, but these men are not rapists or otherwise dangerous. They are pigs, to be sure, but dangerous and "evil?" No, I don't think so.

When we ask ourselves if children should have the right to be intimate with adults, we must also ask if we're *really* willing to give *them* the right to choose, as we proclaim. Having the right to choose an intimate relationship might mean that some LG that we love could choose to have a one night stand with some jerk who only wants her for her body. I would consider such a thing immoral (based on my own personal morality), but I would also consider it *her right* to make an immoral choice. As long as the man involved is merely a pig and not a rapist, I cannot comdemn him for being no worse than a whole shitload of breeder men out there.

But I do concede that I would not want my own child to be left in the care of such a man. I wouldn't want my sister or my mother to be in the care of such a breeder either.

Freedom of choice means also the freedom to choose things we may not agree with. If we ever do see the day when LGs and LBs have the right to choose what they may do with their own bodies, we must be prepared for the reality that some may not choose what we would like. Choice is the key here, for me. As long as a man is respectful enough to not force himself on a LG and to respect her wishes, then his intent is only the concern of the LG he's involved with. That is her right and as long as such men are willing to respect it, we should respect it as well.

As for the position that "I love little girls just because they are little girls." No, you don't. You respect them as people, but don't say "love." You don't "love" a total stranger and it's absurd to claim that you do. None of us here really and truly *love* Dakota Fanning or whoever. We don't even know her. How can you claim to love someone you don't know? We may *want* the opportunity to love her, but that's different. When I see a hot LG walk by in the mall, I'm not thinking "OMG, I love her!" and neither are any of the rest of you. I would never harm her and I respect her as a human being and as an equal, but "love?" No, it's lust, and that's the honest truth. Anyone here who wants to claim that they "love" every LG they lay eyes on had better roll up their pants legs, cuz the bullshit's getting deep in here. I'm guilty of it to, but I know what I'm really saying. When I say "I love little girls" I know full well that I don't actually harbor feelings of real love for every single little girl walking the planet. What I mean to say is "I adore little girls" because they're my favorite kind of person and if given the chance, I'd want the opportunity to find a LG that I can truly love.

Little girls are a unique sect of humanity and it is the traits that tend to go along with being a LG that we "love" not every LG herself. It's semantics, I know, but let's be real here. Every single one of us here is "guilty" of feeling lust without love for a LG. Every single one of us.

When a guy comes along on this board who says he feels nothing but sexual attraction for LGs, all he's really telling us is that he's obviously never been close enough to a LG to feel anything more than superficial sexual desire. We should pity him for that, not hate him for it.

I will readily say that I have been "in lust" with quite a few LGs. I didn't know them well (or at all) and was interested in nothing but how freakin' HOT they were. I will also readily say that I have been deeply in love with a few LGs as well. Having experienced both (as we ALL have), I would much rather have love. The general sentiment here is the same from almost everyone. That doesn't make us "bad" it makes us human and perfectly normal.

So, in a world where it was legal and acceptable to have relationships with LGs, I suspect we would do what every other man does. We'd date a few (or many) girls, we'd sleep with a few just because we wanted to sleep with them and the feeling was mutual, we'd sleep with a few because we felt a deep connection and so did she, and we'd fall in love (probably more than once) and want to stay with that LG forever (if only!).

We are *normal* for feeling lust! Frankly, it sickens me to see so many here that feel they have to pretend like that part doesn't exist. I would rather be accepted by society for who I really am than be accepted based on a whitewashed PC lie. I am a man of both lust and love, just like every other man. There is no shame in that; stop acting like there is! We are NOT the rapist and child molesters they make us out to be (we all know this!) and having sexual desires for a little girl does not make that any less true! Even having *only* sexual desires for a little girl does not make that any less true.

To anyone reading this who feels that LGs are nothing but objects of sexual desire then I say this to you: You simply haven't met the right girl. When you do, and when you fall in love with that little girl, it is the most wonderful feeling and it beats the living shit out of lust any day of the week, my friend!

-BB