GirlChat #390026
but that is really not a 'given,' shipmate
Posted by Student on 2007-April-04 18:35:22 EDT, Wednesday
In reply to Re: Babies, attractive? posted by The Captain on 2007-April-04 16:43:49 EDT, Wednesday
If a person's overwhelming sexual desire is for someone (or something for that matter!) with whom they would not be able to produce a child, then a further explanation is required.
But the idea that the human sex drive is primarily focussed on reproduction is hardly an established scientific fact. It's widely accepted a priori, but there is nothing to prove this. Even if the "reason" for the existance of the drive were solely for reproduction, the drive itself is not focussed on reproduction, by which I mean, men are not aroused by thoughts of reproduction, or contemplating reproduction when mounting a woman. He's interested in "getting some," not producing offspring, and in "coming," not fertilizing.
If you are not convinced, then why does a man find a woman attractive even if he knows she's not fertile (e.g., tubes tied)? Why would ANYBODY find post-menopausal women attractive?
Student
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: but that is really not a 'given,' shipmate - Moth on 2007-April-05 11:44:01 EDT, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: but that is really not a 'given,' shipmate - The Captain on 2007-April-05 03:26:42 EDT, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Thanks for agreeing, Captain, the assumption... - Student on 2007-April-05 22:06:39 EDT, Thursday - (1 / 0 / 0)