Re: Why I'm not interested in Child Models

The issue antis have against some child models is that they're (sometimes) scantily dressed or in a sexually suggestive pose, which would be called 'cheesecake' if it were an adult model. Essentially, one rung below softcore porn; so it's interpreted by antis as the closest legal thing to CP that pedophiles can look at. Of course, there have already been US rulings that even depictions of clothed children in sexually suggestive positions can be considered CP, so that's not very accurate either.

The misunderstanding is based on the idea that pedophiles are attracted to children the same way teleiophiles are attracted to women -- that they are most attractive when they are being sexually suggestive. I think that children (and women) look most attractive when they look calm, casual and natural, and I've heard as much from many people here. By 'casual' I don't mean that I have a thing against formalwear, but I mean that they're not trying hard to affect flattering qualities.