False Advertising

A totally evolved person's not going to be a pedophile, they're going to be someone without sexual preferences save for mental traits which they recognize aren't determined by physical traits, and to not let associations between physical and mental states bias the way they evaluate other individuals.

Gee, for someone who claims that "Hate sucks" you're awfully keen to use hate speech. Nope, no sexual orientation is un-evolved or at a lesser state of evolution. Au contraire, more evolved people are accepting of all sexual orientations.

And sex-negative thinking; which includes a the valuation of asexual relationships over all other kinds isn't the result of free-thinking. Its merely the denial of a valid, healthy and beautiful portion of human experience. This sort of reductionism provides an illusory comfort. But ultimately human experience is more complex and "awesome" without the blinders on.

Just because you wish to buck all the accepted usage of the scientific community in your denial of the concept of orientation, doesn't mean that the rest of us need to lower the level of scientific literacy in our discourse on the topic. ( Did I really say discourse?)

That'd be awesome to have somewhere you continue existing if you died. Heck, even if it had to be hell, I'd prefer that to just not existing at all.

Play too many video games, eh?

While I can't say I've found any sufficient proof of the existence of Hell. Most all versions of Hell are framed in such a way as to make oblivion preferable.

Of course maybe you're the proof that Sarte was right after all.

Dante