oops! found another

Since you will continue with this nastiness Kero-Crap ...

You really are transparent, you not only decided to ban me because I didn't apparently have the right attitude for the GC faith (although allowing a wide variety amongst the other members), you also saw fit to delete my post concerning voyeurism. You had decided that myself and the two other miscreants were too much of a danger to GC, even though I was told I never was a threat. The truth is that the three of us did represent a threat, not to the forum as a whole but to all your neatly packaged ideas about yourselves. A one month ban? I think not, as it was never your intention, you can't even remember what you wrote can you, here it is -

You will not be allowed to pollute this forum with your trolling and self hatred anymore.

I wouldn't like to think this is a sign of early-onset dementia for you Kero, just perhaps more signs of the fantasy world you probably live in.

As if my 'attitude' was likely to change. What is more you are a vindictive little shit perhaps because I took the piss out of your inane 'Survivor' game, which wasn't hard. I had little reason to stay at GC but I am ready to play games like most.

You are supposed to be upset because I had the foresight to see my eventual banning long ago and arrange to have at least one nic so that I could reply? My two bans were unjust compared with what others had done (as you have pointed out, they were given more slack) so why wouldn't I consider my total removal eventually? Also, using a temporary nic (never used for anything else other than the opening post) to test out the responses of the GC membership is so supposedly evil and shocking - do me a favour - look at those who do use alternate nics on a regular basis. Frankly Kero you may be overloaded with work but don't just give pathetic excuses when all is plain to those with eyes. If anyone cares to check (and if the evidence hasn't all been erased) they will find that these two nics were never used until now and the 142857 one only used for that one particular post.

You might see the benefits of not having someone like myself openly expressing their opinion, and I was as honest as I dared to be, but I doubt you will like it any better if I chose to do so surreptitiously - you like a less trusting environment? If you think me as deceitful as the rest of you then you might suspect that I have been using several other nics for years - not likely though?

Oh what righteous indignation - that I had a nic ready for when I was banned and chose to use a temporary nic to test out a hypothesis that you would indeed treat something that fell into line with your thinking with more acceptance. My 'dishonesty' is founded on that, when I made nearly 900 posts giving exactly what I thought without also giving too many insults unless reacting to those that insulted me. At least I came to GC openly as Moth and let you know exactly how I saw things from my perspective and from the start and that stands.

What this little episode has done in my view is to help ensure that your views will still receive the same treatment in the non-pedo world, i.e. censorship, as they generally were before so don't expect any change soon. There will be no change when people will not even listen to you. You have proven one thing, that pedophiles are not ready to be listened to rationally since they are incapable of respecting others. For all the tosh about a 'support' forum, it will be seen as an activism forum by most because of the very nature of this support i.e. reinforcement.

As a moderator you are simply pathetic Kero and it seems a rather nasty person.

I think rewriting history has occurred before too!