GirlChat #502626

Start A New Topic!  Date Index  Thread Index

This was laughable

Posted by Iron Marxist on 2010-May-27 07:04:52 EDT, Thursday
In reply to Ding, ding, ding! We have a winner posted by Lateralus on 2010-May-26 17:55:40 EDT, Wednesday
  Views: 0    Likes: 0     
Are you seriously trying to say that the anti-contact MAAs do not trot out the exact same emotionalistic, highly mainstream diatribes over and over again whenever they debate us? Do they not always use the exact same assumptions and the exact same anti-scientific dogma over and over again? Is the constantly made statement that it's perfectly okay to legally censure innocent people to insure that all the guilty ones never go free not a mantra? I think you are just upset that there are not outspoken anti-contact MAAs on this forum, as when they do challenge us, they are frequently beaten back by scientifically verifiable arguments that are often new to the mainstream. Give me one original form of non-dogmatic argumentation from the anti-contact people and if you actually succeed in doing that, then you can maybe justify your frequent accusation of "cultish" behavior and thought-terminating cliches against the pro-choicers who actually care about our emancipation and the emancipation of the younger people we love. Providing empirically acquired scientific and statistical information over and over again is not a sign of cultish or dogmatic behavior, because it's provable, it's factual, and it's based on reason and logic rather than emotion and moralism. It would seem to me that based upon a solid analysis, the anti-contact MAAs are more cultish and dogmatic by far than the pro-choicers are.

Iron Marxist

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses