GirlChat #503942
The Truth
Posted by Hieronymus on 2010-June-11 06:32:23 EDT, FridayBy "paedophile" i mean a person who, apart from being emotionally attracted to children, could have only a (most) positive effect on a child if they were intimately involved with that child in a physical way.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: I get your meaning, and here is a long answer - rocinante on 2010-June-11 09:10:06 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Begging the question - Dante on 2010-June-11 07:28:40 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 19)
- Re: Begging the question - Hieronymus on 2010-June-12 04:54:31 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Begging the question - Lateralus on 2010-June-11 16:15:45 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 17)
- I can
- qtns2di4 on 2010-June-12 08:13:33 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 6)
- Re: I can
- Lateralus on 2010-June-12 18:03:04 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- Does Evolution give a fuck? - Sigma on 2010-June-12 21:59:27 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Does Evolution give a fuck? - Lateralus on 2010-June-13 16:58:41 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: I can - qtns2di4 on 2010-June-12 20:47:35 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Is pedophilia a viable reporoductive strategy? - Hen-Wen on 2010-June-12 20:24:45 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Is pedophilia a viable reporoductive strategy? - Lateralus on 2010-June-12 20:36:38 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Does Evolution give a fuck? - Sigma on 2010-June-12 21:59:27 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: I can
- Lateralus on 2010-June-12 18:03:04 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- Re: Begging the question - Discerner on 2010-June-11 18:48:14 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 9)
- Re: Begging the question - Lateralus on 2010-June-11 19:17:33 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 8)
- Non-blood-related - Dante on 2010-June-11 19:38:55 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Non-blood-related - Lateralus on 2010-June-11 21:23:47 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 6)
- Incorrect - Dissident on 2010-June-12 08:34:29 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Mischaracterization - Lateralus on 2010-June-12 17:52:23 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- You should have been more clear... - Dissident on 2010-June-13 14:57:38 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- I thought it was obvious, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-June-13 18:04:37 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- You should have been more clear... - Dissident on 2010-June-13 14:57:38 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Mischaracterization - Lateralus on 2010-June-12 17:52:23 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- I'd like to see some unbiased statistics - Discerner on 2010-June-12 01:19:50 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Oh but there are - qtns2di4 on 2010-June-12 08:07:02 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Incorrect - Dissident on 2010-June-12 08:34:29 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- Re: Non-blood-related - Lateralus on 2010-June-11 21:23:47 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 6)
- Non-blood-related - Dante on 2010-June-11 19:38:55 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 7)
- Re: Begging the question - Lateralus on 2010-June-11 19:17:33 EDT, Friday - (1 / 0 / 8)
- I can
- qtns2di4 on 2010-June-12 08:13:33 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 6)