GirlChat #504066
I can
Posted by qtns2di4 on 2010-June-12 08:13:33 EDT, Saturday
In reply to Re: Begging the question posted by Lateralus on 2010-June-11 16:15:45 EDT, Friday
Even dyed-in-the-wool gays don't seem to go higher than 3% according to the best studies, and I can't see how we would be higher than that, even taking into account BLers and GLers as a whole.
I can.
Homosexuality is entirely unreproductive.
Mg and Fb paedophilia are marginally reproductive. Even if they depend in combinations of factors that are not easily present, their chances are definitely greater than with homosexuality.
Therefore, the selective pressure against us is smaller than for homosexuals. That can account for us being two or three as many, when population effects are taken into account.
(This is, obviously, under the assumption of at least some genetic aetiology. Without a genetic aetiology, any numbers are achievable with the variables tweaked well enough)
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: I can
- Lateralus on 2010-June-12 18:03:04 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 5)
- Does Evolution give a fuck? - Sigma on 2010-June-12 21:59:27 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Does Evolution give a fuck? - Lateralus on 2010-June-13 16:58:41 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Re: I can - qtns2di4 on 2010-June-12 20:47:35 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Is pedophilia a viable reporoductive strategy? - Hen-Wen on 2010-June-12 20:24:45 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Is pedophilia a viable reporoductive strategy? - Lateralus on 2010-June-12 20:36:38 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- Does Evolution give a fuck? - Sigma on 2010-June-12 21:59:27 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)