"Wikipedia has a long-held, zero-tolerance policy towards pedophilia or pedophilia advocacy and child pornography. The Wikimedia community is vigilant about identifying and deleting any such material.

All three of those things exist so if they just want to delete the articles on them, then they simply aren't being unbiased or neutral.

This means that students who use Wikipedia to research the academic subject of pedophilia will immediately find a page on the topic that is being targeted by the pedophiles.

Ah yes, "targeted" by pedophiles. Really we just want to contribute to the article about us. Oh that's right whatever we say is a lie. So we simply don't have the right to get our say in?

And at one point they wanted to delete the entire article on Marthijn Uittenbogaard altogether????

How can they possibly consider that unbiased? I mean the guy definitely exists.

Nah, they don't have an agenda, they aren't trying to spread any kind of propaganda.