GirlChat #510039
Re: Y'all misunderstood me.
Posted by qtns2di4 on 2010-September-03 18:27:47 EDT, Friday
In reply to Y'all misunderstood me. posted by gimwinkle on 2010-September-02 22:57:50 EDT, Thursday
I stand firmly on the right of the individual to eat shit and bark at the mood. However, because I am closed minded, I get nauseated just thinking about the individual actually in the process of doing it. Even the thought of urolagnia sends my throat into spasm. However, should a little girl sit on my lap and baptize me...
Which is funny because they are at the same time very similar and very different fetishes.
Though ostensibly similar in their usage of bodily waste, that's about it.
WS is likely more common, both as fantasy and as actual practice (no, I will not confirm or deny having participated in it), but I don't think scat is all that uncommon either, at least as a fantasy.
WS assumes the liquid character of urine and a lot of depends on it and relates to it. Scat, obviously, has very different assumptions about the consistency of its object, and thus, of what can be and is done about it. Just to begin with, urine can directly be drunk and does flow like a liquid. Shit is eaten rather than drunk and doesn't flow all over.
Because of simple plumbing issues, scat is related to anal interests, which themselves are niche. WS doesn't need to relate to a non-genital body part, though, because we pee mostly where we have piv sex anyway.
And then, of course, WS is disease risk-free in healthy subjects, and even the risks inherent to consumption of urea and such are very easy to minimize. Scat, even in healthy subjects, is never entirely disease risk-free.
Otoh, if erotic fiction is any proxy, scat has a lot of comorbidity with WS, but WS doesn't with scat.
Me, I have very friendly views of WS, and were it legal I am sure I would seek the chance to engage with an lg in it.
But, something in scat is just not for me. I could probably end up giving over to a lg coaxing me to try, but I certainly wouldn't have the idea.
Though, as I said under stah's post, I am not exactly "disgusted" by it, given that I have read enough erotic fiction, some of it including it. As far as that goes, when I watched the video I didn't overreact like nearly everyone, even though it was the first time I actually saw anything scat in video.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Y'all misunderstood me. - gimwinkle on 2010-September-03 20:21:43 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- Re: Y'all misunderstood me. - qtns2di4 on 2010-September-03 21:02:38 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)