GirlChat #517475
Re: Yes, but . . .
Posted by lgsinmyheart on 2010-December-14 11:03:47 EST, Tuesday
In reply to Re: Yes, but . . . posted by Lateralus on 2010-December-14 07:19:10 EST, Tuesday
Views: 0 Likes: 0
All we have are the accounts of historians, who are often incredibly biased and/or ignorant of the real events themselves.
Except that civil records of marriages exist in Europe for as much as a thousand years. Obviously there are no records that old in the Americas, I hope not having to explain why. And obviously not everywhere in Europe either: Dresden, for example, is a bad place to do that research.
I just don't believe it was the rule rather than the exception.
Then drop the belief. Records exist.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- Re: Yes, but . . . - Lateralus on 2010-December-14 17:44:51 EST, Tuesday - (0 / 0 / 3)
- There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)
- Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- You insist on showing your ass - Seamus on 2010-December-17 08:39:39 EST, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: There is NO burden of proof upon us - Lateralus on 2010-December-15 21:57:28 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 1)
- There is NO burden of proof upon us - Seamus on 2010-December-15 11:14:19 EST, Wednesday - (0 / 0 / 2)