Re: a different angle

Homosexuality is promiscuous; heterosexuality is monogamous. GL's have a single YF typically and guard her jealously. The posts here reflect that singularity. BL's would prefer several YF's who are butt-fucking each other, and the idea of several adults is one to rejoice rather than get the shotgun out over.

I would question, openly, if that is natural rather than cultural.

I see no specific natural reason for heterosexual monogamy. All I see is the Greco-Roman hangover the West has still not shaken off of itself - and that has been busy promoting for more than a millennium.

Since homosexuality wasn't part of it (for Greco-Romans, because it wasn't reproductive; since the rise of Christianity, because it was sinful and therefore only existed underground or under the admission of counter-cultural expression), it has never been forced to work under the Greco-Roman-Christian constraints of monogamy. There is no logical reason why a revived homosexual identity would embrace the same cultural straitjackets it otherwise found itself questioning.

Even so, it is kinda doing it. When homosexuals not only ask for marriage identical to heterosexuals, but under the same monogamy constraints, you know they have become Westerners too.

But same as I think that homosexuals aren't inherently into the Western monogamy lifestyle and are only adopting it because they are being assimilated; I think that heterosexuals are no more inherently Western monogamous, and simply ended up with the long straw so often for so long than they don't see they are assimilated by Western monogamy just as well.

I certainly know I both want many girls, and don't care what any of them do with another partner as long as I don't lose out due to it.