Re: Agreed.

"When we see children (pre-pubescents) pushing for their "sexual rights" rather than adults doing it for them then perhaps we might give them such rights"

No. No you won't.

You will argue ( as you did elsewhere ) that they can't consent; and therefore don't understand what they're asking for.

You will support the assumed harm and required protections which create an atmosphere poisoning open expression of such desires to the point where each child is an isolated case who is prevented from feeling anything but alone in their desires. And you will dismiss them for their small number since their peers are unlikely to share their feelings in large numbers.

And you will hold that such rights are not theirs, but ours ( read the Majority's ) to grant when they see fit, if ever.

Of course you aren't interested in the question of whether a human being is being denied a right if they're akin to animals. But IIRC, most everyone else who simultaneously compares humans to animals while denying those compared their rights have ended up on the losing side of history. ( To the point where the comparison itself is pop-culture shorthand for "thug." )

Dante