And babies are a "Rock, mineral or something else?"
Something tells me that no matter what you know or don't know, you will keep fishing for "defective." I don't expect your "something else" will be anything other than treating a minority as a defective majority. And you will defend it on religious grounds, ( "I'm entitled to my 'belief,'" ) like all the other homophobes when it can no longer be defended otherwise. ( Replace "homophobes" with the hatred du jour to keep current. )
"Perhaps it is not best to define it but in the real world we have to deal with the affects."
Like ceasing to project and be paranoid about the queers "recruiting" our sons to be Homos?
Yeah, tolerance of others is such a burden.
"Homosexuality might equally be seen as a "fault" from an evolutionary perspective since the pure practice of it leads to their demise, as does paedophilia if practised in the strict sense also."
( Actually, there is much written about the evolutionary advantage of communities having a percentage Gay; not including the Uncle Chester theory. ) But, of course this is BS pseudoscience. The continuance of Homosexuality is an evolutionary fact.
And doesn't the choice to reproduce/adopt tell you something about what Gays do to further their communities genes when given the chance?
Dante