Re: No kidding?

"Provide some unbiased evidence where no grooming took place and I might believe you ..."

Then there is no evidence which will persuade you because grooming is an assumption used in the absence of evidence of coercion to explain someone else choosing that which you would not choose for them.

Your bias is evident in asking for evidence free of your ability to deny the testimony of those who choose differently.

Of course that testimony from the Danes does exist. But anyone who rejects the Rind meta-analysis has evaluative standards which defy reason.

I'll save you the trouble.

* Evidence provided to the contrary *

Lee: "Anecdotal."

Your MO is becoming well known.

Dante