Re: Possession - no victims? read this ...

Actually, I pirated it from you, so you can sue me!

But you aimed more at the magic requirements of the repeated harm theory in that Allah certainly knows blasphemy exists even if it happened in the middle of the forest. As is required of child victims in the repeated harm theory.

But I am not pronouncing on whether "No prophet was harmed in the making of this" - I am saying that the real world existence of blasphemous material has harmful consequences regardless of harm on the making of it. Although the two could be linked (and in the prohibitionist's arguments often are), they need not be linked to be entire arguments in themselves.