Re: Reply

I believe medical pictures are usually exempt from such laws

I don't see why they should. Any of your arguments about revictimization potential and incentive to abuse of others apply too. Still...

but circumcision should really be classed as abuse

...I agree with you, but they are not. This is again, another example of why it matters to actually look at case law, despite what you want to believe is the law. Case law is that circumcision pictures are OK, even though they qualify better for focus and display than a lot of things which have been deemed illegal under those clauses.