...if we acknowledge the sexual attractiveness of girls amidst the rest of their wonderful attributes that make up their totality, then somehow we can only be interested in their sexual attractiveness in his eyes. That is how antis and prudish people think; in a nutshell, sexual admiration is a negative thing, and especially so in kids. Hence, in his view, if we do not deny the sexuality of girls in their entirety, then this somehow subsumes all the other aspects that make up a girl in our minds, as per the anti belief system.
It may seem like he doesn't read many of the posts on this board that celebrates the non-sexual aspects of a girl's totality, but in actuality he merely reads very selectively, and any post made where we acknowledge and respect a girl's sexual aspects, or fail to show disgust over this component of the MAP attraction base, are the only things antis bother to notice. This is one of the main reasons why the MAP/MAA attraction base is so misunderstood by the majority of society: The obsessive focus on just the sexual aspects of our attractions, as if that somehow negates the many other aspects of girls that we admire at least as much as the sexual. It's a famous if very intellectually dishonest method of demonizing a certain group of people, i.e., by ignoring all the evidence that doesn't support the stereotype, and focusing on only the aspect that can presently be used to sufficiently denounce them in the eyes of a general public who is ignorant about the subject. And by playing dumb and being purposely blind to whatever doesn't support his beliefs, my newest friend is counting on everyone in the general public being equally willing to view the evidence in such a highly selective manner.
Since his belief system cannot abide the sexual curiosity of girls, he sees those of us who acknowledge and respect this rather than going into denial of it as constituting examples of trying to "impose our sexuality" upon them. He knows it's dirty pool, but it's the only way he can play the belief game, and he believes dishonesty with both himself and the public is a noble thing to do if it benefits the "greater good" in his own eyes.