Re: Sure thing!

GirlChat #602133

Start A New Topic! Date Index Thread Index

Re: Sure thing!

Posted by EthanEdwards on 2014-September-12 21:15:40 EDT, Friday

In reply to Sure thing! posted by jd420 on 2014-September-12 10:54:43 EDT, Friday

You'd have to do a lot better than just citing a peer-reviewed article as its own evidence of fraud.

I also count 7 co-authors on the paper you cite, hardly suggesting he is some lone crazy voice.

Science is greater than Cantor. If you're on the "rip him apart" side, I honestly suggest sticking with, supporting, and defending science.

You like science. Then show me the peer-reviewed article attacking his findings on the grounds you raise. That would be the first step within the framework of science to resolving this disagreement.

This post is archived, preventing any new replies.

Responses

Ummm... - jd420 on 2014-September-13 04:30:42 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 4)
- An equine observation, if you will..... :) - Dante on 2014-September-13 18:28:49 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
  - And yet... - qtns2di4 on 2014-September-13 22:33:15 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
- Re: Ummm... - EthanEdwards on 2014-September-13 06:25:04 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 1)
  - Yeah, well... - jd420 on 2014-September-13 07:22:14 EDT, Saturday - (0 / 0 / 0)
Re: Sure thing! - Baldur on 2014-September-12 22:04:27 EDT, Friday - (0 / 0 / 0)