McAlester police said anything, including writing, painting and sculpture, can be considered child pornography.

ahem...

In 2002 the United States Supreme Court ruled in Ashcroft v. Free Speech Coalition that the Child Pornography Prevention Act of 1996 (CPPA) was facially invalid in prohibiting virtual or cartoon child pornography.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legal_status_of_cartoon_pornography_depicting_minors#United_States

“An illegal arrest is an assault and battery."

US v. Robinson, 1950.

...just another criminal street gang. According to US v Bad Elk, it may be that "no offense had been committed" should someone start killing McAlester police - after all, english common law does not require that a crime be committed, but only a belief - perhaps a statement of standing policy by the department itself - that a crime will be committed, for self-defense to be factual.

Have a nice day.