Something I said at the outset

"As for the basis of her research, and Vipers' position about our human rights, I stand by my METAPHOR (although for many unfortunate pedos, it's quite literal), which I used on another forum first. She is essentially scientifically determining the best way to make us comfortable in our cages, instead of examining whether those cages are necessary in the first place, and frankly I don't give a damn what she finds out from this particular study. No matter what sort of porn the Vipers say THEY would be satisfied with, they advocate deliberate violation of our human rights to form human relationships with the ones we love"

Also, your conclusion apparently ignores the opinions of anyone who doesn't agree with defining "abuse" based on age groups. I'm not surprised, nor can I expect you to consider that possibility. After all, you'd hardly get an "A+" by even hinting that person A who loves person B who loves person A having fun together just possibly MIGHT NOT be abuse, even if their ages don't fit the demands of bigots who write laws. I'll grant that SOME sexual contact between adults and children is abusive provided that you grant that SOME sexual contact between adults is abusive, and that the age of the participants hasn't got a damned thing to do with it being abuse or not.

By the way, you mean "alleviate" not "elevate" which you've misused several times.