Re: No unintended consequences

I understand you , Qtnstdie4 , your interest in pregnant "children" and child marriage , especially since ,if left alone to their own resources , millions of eligible young girls would die from malnutrition if they were not taken in by wealthy or well to do westerners (or ,heck, even "poor" Americans are better off then they are in ,say , Somalia ,Honduras or china . ) There is absolutely NOTHING immoral or unnatural about the concept of youthful pregnancy ,because nature's unbreakable and infallible law is "if she can bleed she can breed . " For thousands of years , up until last century , girls were considered ripe enough as soon as they reached men-arch and if this were not natural law then it would not be possible for it to happen .

If antis REALLY wanted to protect childhood and "let girls grow up" they would spend every extra dime they had and limit all their spending to save up to donate all their savings to children's charities ,but since they are NOT doing that , they have no right to complain while doing nothing towards their goal , putting down people who want a genuine loving relationship with young girls from impovished nations . It's sort of like the way some people will adopt an animal from the shelter rather then buying one at the pet shop because there are too many unwanted dogs and they will die if no one takes care of them . The pedophile who marries little girls from poor countries and gives them a loving home allows for more kids to be saved then the current policy . It is a moot subject to argue about "harm" caused by such relationships while the alternatives are either shutting down the captialist machine and spending all of their personal money on charities or letting the kids starve to death .