ok, let me be simple and clear on VP and GC

'If your goal is to move the public, I'll offer you a recommendation: Every pro-contact pedophile should go silent. Anything you say about the rights of girls to have sex with adults will only reinforce society's negative impressions of pro-contact pedophiles. The world is full of ordinary people who care deeply for the welfare of young girls. A significant minority will be free of societal taboos and will dare to say the truth as they see it. Leave it to them to figure that girls need this right -- if indeed they need it. (They don't, but I'm assuming your point of view here.)'

Friend, I suggest you read my posts. It's better than assuming my views. Because these are not the views I have stated. To make it simple and clear for you, I think both VP is wrong and GC is wrong.

One is about male sexual guilt, the other is about far-fetched male sexual fantasies.

One is about flirting with the therapeutic state, the other is about invisible defiance.... (what a phrase..)

I am not male. I am female.

I am calling for a more sensible adaptable vibrant celebratory and guiltless girllove. One that dumps all the old toxic PIE and paedophilia baggage, one that is about living in the real world now, contributing girllove in meaningful creative ways in our day to day life's. Challenging the consensus.

And no with the therapeutic state (which has nothing to offer). This isn't NVSH or Summerhill. This isn't experimental and innovative or edgy. Who needs slanted snooper-therapy, you have a weakness?

Well I have no guilt. Pink PRIDE.