I suppose it's possible someone could have wrote something that implied that sort of thing, but I hardly feel it would be seen as the norm around here if one really read the posts.

That's the rub right there, Catcher. Ethan and other anti-choicers (and antis in general) do not read posts objectively. They see what they want to see, and are blind to all else. They make wild, culturally acceptable speculation based on their stated belief and firm insistence that almost no girl would possibly want to be sexual with an icky adult (it goes against their "pure" image) and that none of us could possibly want to make the choice to reciprocate such feelings in a physical manner unless we were driven purely by a raw lust that only viewed the hypothetical girl as an object for selfish gratification (according to our commonly demonized image in the media, which anti-choice MAPs apply only to pro-choicers).

No research data or reliable testimonials will sway them, because their agenda has no interest in facts. It's all about values, beliefs, custom, and the basic retention of the current societal power structures that they were born and raised within all of their lives. To anti-choice MAPs, it's also all about what they consider to be "good" P.R. VirPeds do not officially impose shame or guilt on pedophiliac feelings, but they do clearly insist that acting on such feelings in any type of context would be so potentially toxic to the girls (or boys) in question that it's simply too damn risky for the law to ever allow. Nothing younger people have to say is ever taken into consideration if it goes against the party line, which I believe is one of the major reasons they want youth lib slapped down as a topic in the greater MAP community.