Your preference for absurd speculation over research backed by citation is well known.

Qtns eventually stopped playing your little game over your refusal to cite or cease claiming "facts."

But you aren't actually here to learn anything about humanity, history or civil-rights that you hadn't already concluded prior to looking.

"I could speculate on one aspect of black rights that's somewhat comparable -- the rights of black men to marry white women. From a political standpoint, I predict it would have worked better to have the white women take the lead in this, saying what they wanted, rather than black men marching for this right. I don't know how it really happened, but that would have been my political judgment."

This is why you are a joke.

I would suggest that you try to learn. Research often upends our precious assumptions.

The only thing more absurd than your speculations are your attempts to play-along with the intellectually honest.

( RLY? The Murray-Hill Riot as an example of a LACK of State interference? ) A cursory glance and quote-mining are a sure-fire formula for epic-fail. LOL.

Dante