GirlChat #723594
also ...
Posted by Baldur on 2018-March-24 00:44:10 EDT, Saturday
In reply to Math posted by rainbowloom on 2018-March-23 13:47:47 EDT, Friday
If we square those numbers with the claims presented here, or with the claims made in FBI agent Ken Lanning's research over a quarter century ago (in which, adjusting for the choice of terms he used we find that 80% of sexual abusers of children were not attracted to children at all) we find rough parity between pedophiles and non-pedophiles in sexually abusing children - which is to say that pedophiles appear to be no more likely to sexually abuse children than non-pedophiles, and are possibly a little less likely to do so. Of course we will need to have an atmosphere in which better research can be done before we have more reliable numbers.
This post is archived, preventing any new replies.
Responses
- some progress - Eeyore on 2018-March-24 08:42:20 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- yes, some. - Baldur on 2018-March-24 15:23:26 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- 5%- that's one in twenty! - hieronymus on 2018-March-24 08:04:59 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 4)
- 7.4 *.3722*.05 = - Gimwinkle on 2018-March-24 10:35:38 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 3)
- but we don't have a secret handshake yet! - hieronymus on 2018-March-24 16:22:34 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- but we do! - Baldur on 2018-March-25 00:36:26 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- Not much of a secret - Gimwinkle on 2018-March-25 02:35:19 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 0)
- but we do! - Baldur on 2018-March-25 00:36:26 EDT, Sunday - (1 / 0 / 1)
- but we don't have a secret handshake yet! - hieronymus on 2018-March-24 16:22:34 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 2)
- 7.4 *.3722*.05 = - Gimwinkle on 2018-March-24 10:35:38 EDT, Saturday - (1 / 0 / 3)