One of the most interesting developments in the whole exchange, at least as I see it, is Danny's strong attacks on Virtuous Pedophiles, and his exchanges with Ethan Edwards on the comments section. Yes, as is most often the case, non-choice MAP support organizations dedicated to mainstream thinking on the subject...
Wrong. We are not "dedicated" to mainstream thinking on the subject. Are you dedicated to the mainstream thinking that 2 + 2 = 4, or would you rather say that you have yourself decided it's true? "Mainstream" is a parochial term presuming that all opinions short of legalization are fundamentally the same.

... are not spared the ire of Non-MAPS who are anti-choice.

You leave it to me to point out my decisive rebuttal I made on Tom's blog of your point. Danny is a social conservative whose impulse is to lock us all up.

Quoting from my "HereticTOC" post,

[T]here is a whole class of nons that we have gotten through to, notably Sarah Goode, the late Margaux Fragoso, the ATSA director, the StopSO director, Klaus Beier (Dunkelfeld), Ray Blanchard, Fred Berlin, David Finkelhor, Michael Seto, Mike Bailey, and Paul Federoff -- the last bunch some of the biggest names in mainstream sex research (all quoted on the VP "Our Supporters" page). They do not support the pro-legalization agenda, but they do support our agenda. We do not need to win over ideological social conservatives to make progress.

That is how Margaux Fragoso re-entered the entire conversation. And maybe we were not the direct cause of all these people's beliefs, but they do all support us and we are most definitely spared their ire.